Will Automation Put the Fact in Fact-Check?

Dan Wardby Dan Ward, APR, CPRC

Automated fact-checking may be the wave of the future, according to this Poynter Institute story, and that could be a good thing if it begins to add objectivity to what is currently opinion journalism.

Instead of checking facts and declaring them correct or false, many “fact checkers” today deal in degrees of accuracy, judging stories according to a scale of truthfulness.  Human judgment is required to determine whether a story is true, mostly true or half true, and that judgment requires a subjective review that inevitably is influenced by journalists’ feelings about a topic.  So instead of getting a verdict on whether a statement is true or false, we get an opinion that factors in bias, assumptions and context.

From the story about the goal of automation: “The state of technology and the maturity of fact-checking organizations today make it possible to take the first steps toward that goal.”

In a nascent industry that issues rulings like “Pants on Fire” and “Four Pinocchios,” the term “maturity” rates a Half True at best.

But of course, that’s just my opinion.

Category: Dan Ward, APR, CPRC, Taking Aim Tags: , , 1 Comment

The Importance of Values (and Living up to Them)

 by Connie Mercado What are values? Families have them. Friends have them. Even companies have them. They are words ... Read More »

How Much Should I Spend on Public Relations Services?

by Kacie Escobar, APR Gartner’s 2020 CMO Spend Survey discovered 44% of marketing leaders surveyed have already exp... Read More »

Five Ways PR Pros Can Improve Their Media Relations

by Matt Reed Before joining Curley & Pynn Public Relations Management, I worked in local newsrooms for 25 years ... Read More »

Comments are closed.