Will Automation Put the Fact in Fact-Check?

Dan Wardby Dan Ward

Automated fact-checking may be the wave of the future, according to this Poynter Institute story, and that could be a good thing if it begins to add objectivity to what is currently opinion journalism.

Instead of checking facts and declaring them correct or false, many “fact checkers” today deal in degrees of accuracy, judging stories according to a scale of truthfulness.  Human judgment is required to determine whether a story is true, mostly true or half true, and that judgment requires a subjective review that inevitably is influenced by journalists’ feelings about a topic.  So instead of getting a verdict on whether a statement is true or false, we get an opinion that factors in bias, assumptions and context.

From the story about the goal of automation: “The state of technology and the maturity of fact-checking organizations today make it possible to take the first steps toward that goal.”

In a nascent industry that issues rulings like “Pants on Fire” and “Four Pinocchios,” the term “maturity” rates a Half True at best.

But of course, that’s just my opinion.

Category: Dan Ward, Taking Aim Tags: , , 1 Comment

Marketing in the COVID Age: The Economy is Reopening! Now What?

 by Dan Ward As Florida readies for Phase II of a statewide reopening, many businesses are hustling to prepare for t... Read More »

#WFH Tips Are Everywhere…

by Roger Pynn I don’t know about you, but I’m far more likely to read something with a #WFH headline these days t... Read More »

Celebrating Tourism – and its Eventual Return

by Dan Ward The pandemic has forced many of us to shift our thinking, priorities and way of life. Nowhere has this be... Read More »

Comments are closed.