Track Changes & Journalism

Pynn Rogerby Roger Pynn

Anyone concerned about the future of journalism (in all its forms), and attendant issues of accuracy, transparency and “paper trails,” should read this intriguing article from Chris Dannen at FAST COMPANY’s Co.LABS.

You may think by the time you’re through that all they’ve done is to apply the concepts of Microsoft’s Track Changes or some other group editing tool to the business of online journalism.  But this is so much more, and actually goes to a point I made last week commenting on an earlier post.

I had written about a misleading headline that simply wasn’t supported by the facts in the story.  Rather than updating the story in a way that noted the mistake and let readers know the paper cares about these issues, simply replaced it.  It clearly points to the “rush to publish” mentality and the pressures on newsrooms that are underfunded and understaffed.  Editing is falling by the wayside in many cases.

Dannen’s article points to what could be a new way for journalists to not only address the important issues facing online media, but perhaps to also boost their following, click-through rates, reader loyalty … and, eventually, the bottom line.

Category: Roger Pynn, Taking Aim Tags: , , No Comments


by Roger Pynn I’ve been pondering the difference between value and values more and more lately as I read about mill... Read More »

C&P’s Chief of Accountability

by Dan Ward You probably wouldn’t consider being chased with a box cutter an enjoyable experience, but then few of ... Read More »

Opinion Journalism – Adding “Context” to Fact Checks

by Dan Ward Time for my annual rant about “fact-checking,” otherwise known as opinion journalism. Sites such as F... Read More »

Comments are closed.